-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add libboost-regex-dev key #23620
add libboost-regex-dev key #23620
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Mikael Arguedas <[email protected]>
rosdep/base.yaml
Outdated
@@ -1623,6 +1623,10 @@ libboost-random-dev: | |||
debian: [libboost-random-dev] | |||
fedora: [boost-devel] | |||
ubuntu: [libboost-random-dev] | |||
libboost-regex-dev: | |||
debian: [libboost-regex-dev] | |||
fedora: [boost-regex] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The boost-regex
package contains only the runtime library. All boost development files (including headers and linkable libraries) are provided by boost-devel
. Since the Ubuntu package you're referencing here contains those development files, you should use boost-devel
here.
fedora: [boost-regex] | |
fedora: [boost-devel] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cottsay: so there is no way to install only the devel part for a particular Boost library on Fedora?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh my bad I was copying the other boost entries. Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated the other boost entries accordingly in #23624
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so there is no way to install only the devel part for a particular Boost library on Fedora?
Correct - only the runtime libraries are broken out into individual packages, which doesn't typically help us here because we don't typically take a runtime dependency in a package.xml if we take a devel dependency for building...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure I completely understand your last comment there, but the context in which this PR is submitted: Generating ‘dev’ and runtime artefacts from ROS packages.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That exactly describes the behavior I was (poorly) trying to describe above as atypical.
@mikaelarguedas - #23624 looks right at a glance - I can take a closer look in the A.M.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Co-Authored-By: Scott K Logan <[email protected]>
* add libboost-regex-dev key Signed-off-by: Mikael Arguedas <[email protected]> * use boost-devel to get headers Co-Authored-By: Scott K Logan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Scott K Logan <[email protected]>
No description provided.